February 10, 2025 – Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court in Abuja has indefinitely adjourned the trial of Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). This decision follows Kanu’s insistence that Justice Nyako cannot preside over his case due to her previous recusal from the proceedings.

Nnamdi Kanu has been at the center of a legal battle concerning his advocacy for the independence of Biafra. He was ordered to appear in court on Monday, February 10, 2025, but during the hearing, his legal representatives raised concerns about the judge’s ability to impartially oversee the trial. They cited her prior recusal as a significant issue.

Earlier in January, Kanu filed a formal petition with the National Judicial Council against Justice Nyako, accusing her of judicial misconduct in handling his case. The allegations stem from Kanu’s belief that the judge has not managed his trial fairly, leading him to insist on her disqualification.

In light of the ongoing issues, Kanu has suggested that if no other judge at the Federal High Court in Abuja is willing to take over the case, it should be transferred to a court in the South-East region of Nigeria. This request emphasizes Kanu’s contention that achieving a fair trial may be difficult under the current circumstances.

The indefinite adjournment raises significant questions about the future of Kanu’s trial and the broader implications for the IPOB movement. Supporters of Kanu view this as yet another hurdle in a protracted legal battle, while critics argue that the ongoing delays reflect a failure in the judicial process.

The court’s decision has garnered attention from legal observers, political figures, and human rights advocates, all of whom continue to monitor the situation closely. As the case remains in limbo, further developments are expected in the coming weeks. Kanu’s legal team is likely to strategize on how to proceed, particularly regarding their demands for a different judge or a change of venue.